mirror of
https://github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial.git
synced 2025-11-06 10:29:31 -06:00
get remote follows/accepts working
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7b4f847d8
commit
d69786ef17
16 changed files with 459 additions and 104 deletions
|
|
@ -326,3 +326,87 @@ func (p *processor) AccountRelationshipGet(authed *oauth.Auth, targetAccountID s
|
|||
|
||||
return r, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (p *processor) AccountFollowCreate(authed *oauth.Auth, form *apimodel.AccountFollowRequest) (*apimodel.Relationship, ErrorWithCode) {
|
||||
// if there's a block between the accounts we shouldn't create the request ofc
|
||||
blocked, err := p.db.Blocked(authed.Account.ID, form.TargetAccountID)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, NewErrorInternalError(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if blocked {
|
||||
return nil, NewErrorNotFound(fmt.Errorf("accountfollowcreate: block exists between accounts"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// make sure the target account actually exists in our db
|
||||
targetAcct := >smodel.Account{}
|
||||
if err := p.db.GetByID(form.TargetAccountID, targetAcct); err != nil {
|
||||
if _, ok := err.(db.ErrNoEntries); ok {
|
||||
return nil, NewErrorNotFound(fmt.Errorf("accountfollowcreate: account %s not found in the db: %s", form.TargetAccountID, err))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// check if a follow exists already
|
||||
follows, err := p.db.Follows(authed.Account, targetAcct)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, NewErrorInternalError(fmt.Errorf("accountfollowcreate: error checking follow in db: %s", err))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if follows {
|
||||
// already follows so just return the relationship
|
||||
return p.AccountRelationshipGet(authed, form.TargetAccountID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// check if a follow exists already
|
||||
followRequested, err := p.db.FollowRequested(authed.Account, targetAcct)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, NewErrorInternalError(fmt.Errorf("accountfollowcreate: error checking follow request in db: %s", err))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if followRequested {
|
||||
// already follow requested so just return the relationship
|
||||
return p.AccountRelationshipGet(authed, form.TargetAccountID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// make the follow request
|
||||
fr := >smodel.FollowRequest{
|
||||
AccountID: authed.Account.ID,
|
||||
TargetAccountID: form.TargetAccountID,
|
||||
ShowReblogs: true,
|
||||
URI: util.GenerateURIForFollow(authed.Account.Username, p.config.Protocol, p.config.Host),
|
||||
Notify: false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if form.Reblogs != nil {
|
||||
fr.ShowReblogs = *form.Reblogs
|
||||
}
|
||||
if form.Notify != nil {
|
||||
fr.Notify = *form.Notify
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// whack it in the database
|
||||
if err := p.db.Put(fr); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, NewErrorInternalError(fmt.Errorf("accountfollowcreate: error creating follow request in db: %s", err))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if it's a local account that's not locked we can just straight up accept the follow request
|
||||
if !targetAcct.Locked && targetAcct.Domain == "" {
|
||||
if _, err := p.db.AcceptFollowRequest(authed.Account.ID, form.TargetAccountID); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, NewErrorInternalError(fmt.Errorf("accountfollowcreate: error accepting folow request for local unlocked account: %s", err))
|
||||
}
|
||||
// return the new relationship
|
||||
return p.AccountRelationshipGet(authed, form.TargetAccountID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// otherwise we leave the follow request as it is and we handle the rest of the process asynchronously
|
||||
p.fromClientAPI <- gtsmodel.FromClientAPI{
|
||||
APObjectType: gtsmodel.ActivityStreamsFollow,
|
||||
APActivityType: gtsmodel.ActivityStreamsCreate,
|
||||
GTSModel: >smodel.Follow{
|
||||
AccountID: authed.Account.ID,
|
||||
TargetAccountID: form.TargetAccountID,
|
||||
URI: fr.URI,
|
||||
},
|
||||
OriginAccount: authed.Account,
|
||||
TargetAccount: targetAcct,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// return whatever relationship results from this
|
||||
return p.AccountRelationshipGet(authed, form.TargetAccountID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue