# Description
> If this is a code change, please include a summary of what you've coded, and link to the issue(s) it closes/implements.
>
> If this is a documentation change, please briefly describe what you've changed and why.
This pull request adds a check to see whether interaction policy on a refreshed status is different from the interaction policy set on that status before, and updates the status with the new policy if it's changed.
Should fix a pesky issue where folks on v0.19.2 and above still can't interact with statuses they dereferenced before updating.
## Checklist
Please put an x inside each checkbox to indicate that you've read and followed it: `[ ]` -> `[x]`
If this is a documentation change, only the first checkbox must be filled (you can delete the others if you want).
- [x] I/we have read the [GoToSocial contribution guidelines](https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I/we have discussed the proposed changes already, either in an issue on the repository, or in the Matrix chat.
- [x] I/we have not leveraged AI to create the proposed changes.
- [x] I/we have performed a self-review of added code.
- [x] I/we have written code that is legible and maintainable by others.
- [x] I/we have commented the added code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
- [ ] I/we have made any necessary changes to documentation.
- [ ] I/we have added tests that cover new code.
- [x] I/we have run tests and they pass locally with the changes.
- [x] I/we have run `go fmt ./...` and `golangci-lint run`.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/pulls/4474
Reviewed-by: kim <gruf@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
Co-committed-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
# Description
> If this is a code change, please include a summary of what you've coded, and link to the issue(s) it closes/implements.
>
> If this is a documentation change, please briefly describe what you've changed and why.
Brings our parsing of unset sub-policies in line with the defaults documented here: https://docs.gotosocial.org/en/v0.19.1/federation/interaction_policy/#defaults-per-sub-policy
Closes https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/issues/4146
Part of https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/issues/4026
## Checklist
Please put an x inside each checkbox to indicate that you've read and followed it: `[ ]` -> `[x]`
If this is a documentation change, only the first checkbox must be filled (you can delete the others if you want).
- [x] I/we have read the [GoToSocial contribution guidelines](https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I/we have discussed the proposed changes already, either in an issue on the repository, or in the Matrix chat.
- [x] I/we have not leveraged AI to create the proposed changes.
- [x] I/we have performed a self-review of added code.
- [x] I/we have written code that is legible and maintainable by others.
- [x] I/we have commented the added code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
- [ ] I/we have made any necessary changes to documentation.
- [x] I/we have added tests that cover new code.
- [x] I/we have run tests and they pass locally with the changes.
- [x] I/we have run `go fmt ./...` and `golangci-lint run`.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/pulls/4229
Co-authored-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
Co-committed-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
This pull request deprecates `with_approval` and `always` on the client API side, and `approvalRequired` and `always` on the fedi API side, replacing them with `automatic_approval` and `manual_approval` and `automaticApproval` and `manualApproval`, respectively.
Back-compat is kept with these deprecated fields, and they're still serialized to the client API and fedi APIs respectively, in addition to the new non-deprecated properties.
This will stay the case until v0.21.0 when they'll be removed.
For the sake of not doing a massive database migration, the fields are still named `Always` and `WithApproval` in storage. I think this is probably fine!
Part of https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/issues/4026
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/pulls/4173
Co-authored-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
Co-committed-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
* convert statuses.visibility and notifications.notification_type columns from type string -> int for performance / space savings
* fix test trying to compare string to int
* fix instance count query using string literal instead of gtsmodel const type
* ensure a default value is always set
* also migrate the account settings and sin bin status tables
* initialize maps outside loops and place into singular enum mapping creation func
* use int16 for enum types
* update sinbinstatus creation to be from a snapshot at initial creation
* add snapshot of poll type at creation time
* [chore] Add interaction filter to complement existing visibility filter
* pass in ptr to visibility and interaction filters to Processor{} to ensure shared
* use int constants for for match type, cache db calls in filterctx
* function name typo 😇
---------
Co-authored-by: kim <grufwub@gmail.com>
* [feature] Allow users to set default interaction policies
* use vars for default policies
* avoid some code repetition
* unfuck form binding
* avoid bonkers loop
* beep boop
* put policyValsToAPIPolicyVals in separate function
* don't bother with slices.Grow
* oops
