Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
tobi
754b7be9cf [feature] Support new model of interaction flow for forward compat with v0.21.0 (#4394)
~~Still WIP!~~

This PR allows v0.20.0 of GtS to be forward-compatible with the interaction request / authorization flow that will fully replace the current flow in v0.21.0.

Basically, this means we need to recognize LikeRequest, ReplyRequest, and AnnounceRequest, and in response to those requests, deliver either a Reject or an Accept, with the latter pointing towards a LikeAuthorization, ReplyAuthorization, or AnnounceAuthorization, respectively. This can then be used by the remote instance to prove to third parties that the interaction has been accepted by the interactee. These Authorization types need to be dereferencable to third parties, so we need to serve them.

As well as recognizing the above "polite" interaction request types, we also need to still serve appropriate responses to "impolite" interaction request types, where an instance that's unaware of interaction policies tries to interact with a post by sending a reply, like, or boost directly, without wrapping it in a WhateverRequest type.

Doesn't fully close https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/issues/4026 but gets damn near (just gotta update the federating with GtS documentation).

Migrations tested on both Postgres and SQLite.

Co-authored-by: kim <grufwub@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/pulls/4394
Co-authored-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
Co-committed-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
2025-09-14 15:37:35 +02:00
nicole mikołajczyk
29d481d769 [bugfix] delete interaction requests when deleting account (#4278)
Signed-off-by: nicole mikołajczyk <git@mkljczk.pl>

# Description

I recently noticed that pending interaction requests don't disappear on domain suspension.

## Checklist

- [x] I/we have read the [GoToSocial contribution guidelines](https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [ ] I/we have discussed the proposed changes already, either in an issue on the repository, or in the Matrix chat.
- [x] I/we have not leveraged AI to create the proposed changes.
- [x] I/we have performed a self-review of added code.
- [x] I/we have written code that is legible and maintainable by others.
- [x] I/we have commented the added code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
- [ ] I/we have made any necessary changes to documentation.
- [ ] I/we have added tests that cover new code.
- [x] I/we have run tests and they pass locally with the changes.
- [x] I/we have run `go fmt ./...` and `golangci-lint run`.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/pulls/4278
Co-authored-by: nicole mikołajczyk <git@mkljczk.pl>
Co-committed-by: nicole mikołajczyk <git@mkljczk.pl>
2025-06-19 10:21:03 +02:00
Daenney
ab10266bff [feature] Move to code.superseriousbusiness.org 2025-04-26 15:38:43 +02:00
tobi
f23f04e0b1
[feature] Interaction requests client api + settings panel (#3215)
* [feature] Interaction requests client api + settings panel

* test accept / reject

* fmt

* don't pin rejected interaction

* use single db model for interaction accept, reject, and request

* swaggor

* env sharting

* append errors

* remove ErrNoEntries checks

* change intReqID to reqID

* rename "pend" to "request"

* markIntsPending -> mark interactionsPending

* use log instead of returning error when rejecting interaction

* empty migration

* jolly renaming

* make interactionURI unique again

* swag grr

* remove unnecessary locks

* invalidate as last step
2024-08-24 11:49:37 +02:00
tobi
5bc567196b
[chore] Add interaction policy gtsmodels (#3075)
* [chore] introduce interaction policy gts models

* update migration a smidge

* fix copy paste typo

* update migration

* use int for InteractionType
2024-07-11 15:44:29 +01:00